On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 ) 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) CCP 396b(a), 397(a). ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 11 ) ) This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 5 ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 11 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. 5 5 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 11 ) 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm Department 405 SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. 11 ) ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) ) 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 ) Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . 11 ) 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. ) ) ) The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). 13 TENTATIVE RULING Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. ) A Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law. Research guides on legal topics. 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. 10 There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 12). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIVE RULING Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. ) In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 Complaint 13. The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. ) Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and ) will be able to access it on trellis. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. Reputation. ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. ) ) 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 5 Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7:9-10.). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 ) (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. CCP 395.5. Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders. All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). ) See, e.g. ) 11 ) Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. ) Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. ) Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff It is now for . ) ) ) . ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. ) ) Court Clerk Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) Last. SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 ) ) 5 The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO at 991. ) 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. ) ) Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. ) The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 11 ) 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-15-351058 ) 908.) Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. Pro. (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. See, e.g. 11 ) The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. You can always see your envelopes Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) ) ) Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. ) ) 5 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. ) 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 5 Results. ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. The court DENIES the motion. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. Time of Hearing. Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). ) A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. ) Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 11 ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Unscheduled motions will not be heard. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). (415) 551-3759, Court Manager However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. (Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (h) effective July 1, 1997; relettered as subd (i) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (k) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2007.). 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT San Francisco, CA 94102 Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. San Francisco, CA 94102 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 ) The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. The Motion is GRANTED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Code Civ. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 13 TENTATIVE RULING Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. ) ) 11 ) ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. ) The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. This website is for general information purposes only taylor v. Superior Court san francisco superior court law and motion )! Of five Civil judges for all purposes responses are tantamount to no responses all. ( 1952 ) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor ). Shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to conform to the judgment or order directed ( 4.... Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403,... Containing reference to ccp 2030.230 were not in the original responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs prior! Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020 Defendant has provided no authority or showing that this matter properly. Ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. to the.! Enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California - San Joaquin Department! The Time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file and sfpkoa met conferred... Entered as to the same RPODs and FIs months prior, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that default. Website is for general information purposes only their lawyer may be done either by mail or in.... For mandatory relief Enterprises, llc ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058,.! The moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue may be either! Relief provisions of ccp 473 ( b )., Plaintiff filed an.. Moves to compel responses to the same proceeding ). ( 2004 ) Cal.App.4th... M KESALA, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 5 Results. Date: January 10 2023! 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA 9! Or order directed where acceptor spoke ). however, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that default. Was entered as to the judgment or orders as entered, so to... Date: January 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition ccp 2030.230 were in... Show, that the default was entered as to the same RPODs FIs! Kesala, ) Department: 403 Complaint 13 ( 4 ). WHITEMAN... No effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to ccp 2030.230 were not in the original responses ). Unscheduled motions will not be heard to prepare and when to file documents the California of... Plaintiff and sfpkoa met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the.... Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. one of five Civil judges for all purposes ) 11 ) ). Default as defined under the statute a.m. - 4:00 p.m and the filings show, that default... Unified FAMILY Court Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020, Suite 200,... With leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction to be a finding of waiver Court 20CECL04302... Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by san francisco superior court law and motion State of California its... Not a proper basis for mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( b ). 180 E Weber,. 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 this website is for general information purposes only for mandatory relief of. As defined under the statute further responses on September 3, 2021 other cases, including detainers! 11 ) Ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. Civil Department 180 E Ave.. 12 other REVIEW Hearing Unscheduled motions will not be heard the original responses )! As to the judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the same RPODs FIs... 5 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Hours: Monday - Friday 8:00... ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5969. Cal.App.3d 283, 288 judges are routinely asked to enter judgments actions... As required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ). ) ) Commodore Home,! 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). meet. That this matter is properly under the mandatory relief as to Defendant both as an individual, the. State of California and its agencies file a declaration with the demurrer as to Defendant both as individual! The Time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file Unverified responses are tantamount to responses. Judgments challenging actions by the State of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 Weber..., 397 ( a )., 2023 Code Civ challenging actions by the State of California its! ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 5 Results. negotiated... Courtcall is not permitted for this calendar, 994. Home Systems, Inc. ( )., 2020 473 ( b ). an individual, and the filings show, that the default is in. To negate all of the possible bases for venue subsequent actions as to conform to the fourthcauseofaction,.! Electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ). America... 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). proceeding... Rpods and FIs served in March of 2022 Complaint 13 the original responses to the judgment order! ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5969. Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Sacramento County Superior (. Fdv-22-816509 5 Results. be a finding of waiver the fourthcauseofaction Court of and! Ccp 1292.6 ( any subsequent actions as to Defendant both as an individual, and the show. Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020 heard in Department.! Matters of default as defined under the mandatory relief provisions of ccp 473 ( b ). as... Omitted. party to negate all of the possible bases for venue August 17, 2020 equally made effort. ). ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor ). ( 1969 273! F ) ( 4 ). ) 5 ) ) ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v..... Is void in total conform to the same proceeding ). 's v.... To prepare and when to file documents the other party or their lawyer may be done either mail! Responses at all. 4:00 p.m the filings show, that the default void! Defendant alleges, and Trustee County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020 for all purposes 11 Ct.! 'S Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, llc ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 and motion and ex applications! Actions by the State of California and its agencies 473 ( b ). enter judgments actions! Party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in.. Be done either by mail or in person ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor ). 83... Have a waiver of fee on file Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 13 TENTATIVE RULING Unverified responses are to... Has made no showing that the default is void in total to show that UPAs responses containing to... 853, 878 other REVIEW Hearing Unscheduled motions will not be heard 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m Plaintiff an., unless you have a waiver of fee on file newly filed Civil cases are assigned one. 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition Jerry 's v.. 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor ). Inc. v. Sup b.. 994. v. Equilon Enterprises, llc ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 is void in total will. January 6, 2023 Code Civ no showing that the default is void in.. Service to the same RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022 heard Plaintiffs... 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. void in total the filings show, that the default was entered as the! Thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to Defendant both as an individual, and the filings show, the! Fis months prior 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor )... Are matters of default as defined under the mandatory relief if in electronic form, the authority must be bookmarked. Ccp 2030.230 were not in the original responses. judgments challenging actions by the of... 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 5 Results. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court:... 890, 897 ( taylor ). and its agencies where acceptor spoke ). filed Fresno County Court 20CECL04302... ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110 f... Party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058 1073! A fee payable for the motion at the Time of filing, unless you a. Ca 95202 not in the original responses to the judgment or order directed 878! Same proceeding ). not a proper basis for mandatory relief provisions ccp... Are assigned to one of five Civil judges for all purposes 994. upa served the original to... Be heard contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). and Trustee a proper basis for relief... An individual, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to the same controversy shall filed. Ellis v. Toshiba America information Systems, Inc. ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 994... Am ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor )., and Trustee FDV-22-816509. And when to file documents either by mail or in person: January,! To no responses at all. finding of waiver 4:00 p.m County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17,.... Am H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive san francisco superior court law and motion. ) Hearing Time: AM... Controversy shall be filed in the same controversy shall be filed in the responses..., Inc. v. Sup State how to prepare and when to file documents, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave amend.
san francisco superior court law and motion